Cornell faculty senate votes no-confidence in school's leadership

What the coverage shows

All four outlets frame the story around Cornell faculty’s no-confidence vote and describe it as symbolic rather than binding. The Guardian US and South China Morning Post explicitly connect the vote to an alleged gang rape or fraternity rape, while the New York Times and BBC use broader sexual-assault or Jane Doe wording in their headlines and extracts. The BBC is the only outlet whose extract spells out that staff do not have the power to remove university leaders.

Written by Crossfiled from the 4 headlines and extracts below, not from the articles themselves. It describes how the outlets framed this, not what happened. Open any headline for a summary of that article.